tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5449677811690616608.post1594323799093309852..comments2023-12-15T21:49:46.651+01:00Comments on Pluralist Speaks: Examining the NACC PositionPluralist (Adrian Worsfold)http://www.blogger.com/profile/01922153724523820866noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5449677811690616608.post-44484775966831163842011-11-28T07:26:07.509+01:002011-11-28T07:26:07.509+01:00Hi Adrian,
I am interested in your comment: "...Hi Adrian,<br />I am interested in your comment: "Neo-Orthodoxy is the means to a form of non-realism, or certainly a form of postmodernism that the trinitarians of old would have dismissed as completely heterodox. They knew how to defend the Trinity. The trick in the latest theological fast lane is in the use of the word 'Neo'. But, yes, the Neo-Orthodox can go places inside the bureaucracy because Neo-Orthodoxy has the intellectual and virtual appearance of one thing and yet the contents of something else - Karl Barth's invisible hand made narratively invisible into text."<br /><br />I would be interested in hearing more from you on this. Why does it lead to non-realism? Why would trinitarians of old dismiss it as heterodox? Would you care to name who are the neo-orthodox in the Anglican theological world today?Peter Carrellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09535218286799156659noreply@blogger.com