Mary Contrary Drivel

Here's a piece of theological reasoning that shows divorce from any biology and any historiography (unless fantasy is introduced as one type).

However, what we can say about Mary is that she was a pure virgin; that she was prepared by God from the very beginning in what she had to do. If, for some, that means 'Immaculate Conception then that is their language. Similarly with the Assumption, notwithstanding the particular language of the dogma, we can say surely that Mary reigns with Christ in glory. With Bishop Ken we can say, 'Heaven with transcendent joys her entrance graced, Next to his throne her Son his Mother placed.'

A pure virgin (including sinless)? Even if you might think Jesus was born of no conception from his dad, there were stated brothers and sisters. And how is it that speculations from theologians can produce any such declaration about sinlessness regarding Mary's condition and behaviour that has any actual meaning as regards that actual person?

Until Jesus, Mary and the lot of them are regarded as fully and completely human, understandable (or not) by normal rules of history, and by normal rules of biology (and physics) - and also until present day Christians speak a communicable language, then this sort of Christianity will remain a joke for anyone of contemporary means of knowledge and discourse.