Archbishop Evil

It's important to spread this around a bit. An article in The Atlantic, written by Eliza Griswold, paints a portrait of competitive religion in Nigeria and the rise there of prosperity theology amidst corruption and strife. Part of the article highlights what is utterly sinister and about an Archbishop who, in this darkness, can only be regarded as evil.

At the time of the massacre [at Yelwa in 2004], Archbishop Peter Akinola was the president of the Christian Association of Nigeria, whose membership was implicated in the killings. He has since lost his bid for another term but, as primate of the Anglican Church of Nigeria, he is still the leader of 18 million Anglicans....

"My views on Islam are well known: I have nothing more to say," he said, as we sat down. Archbishop Akinola has repeatedly spoken critically about Islam and liberal Western Protestants, and he was understandably wary of my motives for asking his thoughts. For Akinola, the relationship between liberal Protestants and Islam is straightforward: if Western Christians abandon conservative morals, then the global Church will be weakened in its struggle against Islam. "When you have this attack on Christians in Yelwa, and there are no arrests, Christians become dhimmi, the vocabulary within Islam that allows Christians and Jews to be seen as second-class citizens. You are subject to the Muslims. You have no rights."

When asked if those wearing name tags that read "Christian Association of Nigeria" had been sent to the Muslim part of Yelwa, the archbishop grinned. "No comment," he said. "No Christian would pray for violence, but it would be utterly naive to sweep this issue of Islam under the carpet." He went on, "I'm not out to combat anybody. I'm only doing what the Holy Spirit tells me to do. I'm living my faith, practicing and preaching that Jesus Christ is the one and only way to God, and they respect me for it. They know where we stand. I've said before: let no Muslim think they have the monopoly on violence."

Anglicans, or anyone else religious, should regard this man with scorn and contempt. This includes his giving motives for immigration into Western countries that are just not the case, as he spreads his ignorant poison to elsewhere (from the same article):

"People are thinking that Islam is an issue in Africa and Asia, but you in the West are sitting on explosives." What people in the West don't understand, he said, "is that what Islam failed to accomplish by the sword in the eighth century, it's trying to do by immigration so that Muslims become citizens and demand their rights. A Muslim man has four wives; the wives have four or five children each. This is how they turned Christians into a minority in North Africa."

He went on, "The West has thrown God out, and Islam is filling that vacuum for you, and now your Christian heritage is being destroyed … You people are so afraid of being accused of being Islam-phobic. Consequently everyone recedes and says nothing … Over the years, Christians have been so naive-avoiding politics, economics, and the military because they're dirty business. The missionaries taught that. Dress in tatters. Wear your bedroom slippers. Be poor. But Christians are beginning to wake up to the fact that money isn't evil, the love of money is, and it isn't wrong to have some of it. Neither is politics."

If evangelicals think they need to join GAFCON then they must be desperate; if the Archbishop of Canterbury thinks he must appeal to keep this man in the Anglican Communion then he really does put international ecclesiastical bureaucracy above human rights.