data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ecd/79ecdf80f96faf2f24f1ed397e4ad49c1452bcba" alt=""
Then, of course, we might ask, "What difference does it make?" After all, artifice may be a more accurate reflection of the day. My first and positive encounter with Rutter, that I looked up (a sort of, "What was that?") was at the University of Essex Chaplaincy back in 1982. I now have one John Rutter CD, but select pieces from it for use. They are well received. But there is always the sense that most of his output is like classical music played on BBC Radio 4 rather than (or only occasionally on) BBC Radio 3 (with the notable exception of his Hymn to the Creator of Light). In the programme he does admit influence into the back of his mind from the pop world. He puts out a good tune and can hit the right buttons. It connects. Let's face it, too, that much of Anglicanism is dumping music of any sacred value.
I have nothing by James MacMillan, but have the main 'Orthodox' pieces by John Tavener on a number of CDs. They are difficult to hear when you have tinnitus, as I have. On one of the most expensive, I took one and increased its levels as a computer file, and then could hear traffic in the background! Is that why the levels do not peak fully on the actual CD? After all, if they don't use the levels available, all we do is put the volume up and it is better if the levels are correct that you don't then fiddle with the knob.
No comments:
Post a Comment