
There is one traditional liturgy and one that is more radical. Now the traditional one is capable of being liberal Christian but it is also capable of drawing from other faiths and secular sources. It gives a traditional feel. The radical one is still liturgical (the idea being to have an updated liturgical book that replaces Orders of Worship from way back in 1932) but its content is deliberately of new thinking and towards the broad based.
These texts I may review, give a few days running up to Sunday, and indeed the CD can be altered and even have one per service, not one for both.
Both services don't just reflect on my thinking, but are articulations on how the congregation thinks (I think).

It's why I react against the Federation course of Contextual Theology. It's not our context. But the problem with any liturgy once the normative theology is gone is that they need revision. It is why we can't use the 1932 book any more. The trick is to get the feel of the 1932 book and alter its substance.
If the liturgies get revised, don't be surprised!
No comments:
Post a Comment