Sadly, this is a thought that has bubbled up in my mind on any number of occasions - frequently somewhere around hour eight... Occasionally much after...
Unitarians did, and in one case in the UK still produced one, with maybe a few using 1932, but the language moves on at such a rate and there is no consensus about their meaning and adequacy to use them any more. One of two still do much extempore.
Perhaps on occasion, use the prayer book as a starter and update the words. That would be a bit easier than starting from scratch every week. Although, original liturgies can be lovely.
The lack of readily available frameworks for worship is a major failing for those lay persons who are called upon occasionally to lead Unitarian services ; when I was in this position some years ago many hours were spent searching for suitable readings/prayers/meditations even before one got to considering the sermon.
I think congregations generally appreciate a few familiar landmarks in the service ; too many lead to the 'liturgical coma' but too few and services become a succession of novelties ; newcomers,particularly,in my opinion,appreciate some kind of 'map' of what is going to happen and like to know where the church is 'coming from',doctrinally. In a denomination where fewer and fewer chapels have settled ministry, an outline framework for worship could establish a valuable unity for the congregation while in no way hampering the freedom of the worship leader to explore his/her own distinct message.
I use prayer books for structures, but none relate to Unitarian ranges of belief. In this one there is the structure of sorry, thanks, reading, a celebration of time, sermon, but more the hymn sandwich, and more on music for meditation along with all the hymn tunes to put to CD (with no organist). I fear now it is all too long.
Habitual worship and sufficient cause
-
There are two phrases of deliberate ambiguity in the rules for eligibility
to be on the electoral roll: that someone is a 'habitual worshipper', or
that th...
The horizontal and the vertical
-
As I was writing this sermon this week (Nov 2019), my husband and I began
our traditional and seasonal debate about the atmosphere:- not extinction
r...
INTERIM
-
Yesterday, I'd written a few words about my state of mind and heart since
my husband, Tom, died last year. This morning, I looked at my words from
yesterda...
The Danger of Equanimity
-
Equanimity is prized in Buddhism. Some would say it's the second biggest
goal of Buddhist life and practice - the ability to be unswayed by things
that ha...
This blog location will be deleted by May 17
-
Just a reminder that this blog location has moved to aprildeconick.com.
The blogger location will be deleted on May 17. We will have a party!
Linguistics and Loanwords in the Gospel of Mark
-
Scholarly readers of the Gospel of Mark have long noted the conspicuous
presence of non-Greek terms and phrases. A forthcoming article sets the
analysis o...
Faith Journey (part 9)
-
The following section is probably unnecessary if you have read, meditated
upon, and inwardly digested my previous posts. However, there are a number
of co...
Blogging @ UCCN
-
Led by Louise Rogers, a group of UCCN-ers chose to start blogging. In
Louise's words, this is what we've been doing during the blogging workshop.
And the...
Sight impairment - emotional responses
-
There are many ways to react to sight impairment depending upon when the
sight impairment happened, how it happened and the circumstances and
personality o...
Worship should be broad. And deep. But broad.
-
It’s my day off after FUSE and I’m supposed to be working on the refresh
the Inquirer website. (Which I promise I will do more on this evening.)
But, I’ve ...
Am I enough? Am I doing enough?
-
I’ve been struggling a bit lately with a sense of mediocrity and a feeling
of confusion about what I should be trying to do with my life. I can’t seem
to s...
To defend the rights of our soul
-
So … new year … new post, after a long silence due to the need to think
back about some religious bases of my life … And this new post is just to
start thi...
Tears of Love
-
Of your charity,
oh my Lord,
let me weep.
For tears touched
by the magic of sunlight
become diamonds,
and golden memories
light up my dark road.
In ...
Integrating the Alien - Refugees
-
When people leave their country of residence due to oppression and/or a
fear for their life, they become refugees. The Hebrews, in the book of
Exodus, were...
The BBC's divisive belief test
-
Sir Tim Berners-Lee (the inventor of the World Wide Web and a Unitarian
Universalist) invited me to present the Thought for the Day, on the BBC's Today
Pr...
More small beauties
-
*21 May 2015 *
The birds are singing, the sky is blue with fluffy white clouds. Creamy
frothy blossom on a rowan tree. Dark blue spikes of bugle flowers. A ...
Gaza
-
*Letter to my MP: Israeli bombardmen**t of Palestine *
I am very disturbed by recent events in Gaza, including the bombing of a
hospital, and the fact that...
Out With The Old, In With The New
-
Happy New Year from the UUA! As the clock ticked down on truly momentous
year for Unitarian Universalism, I reflected on all the amazing work being
done in...
Settlin' Into My Life in St. Croix
-
Installation Ceremony - December 9, 2012
One of the first things I did upon arriving in St. Croix was to rejoin the
Writer's Circle. I had the opportun...
Archiving the Sixth Edition APA Style Blog
-
Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes (turn and face the strange) Ch-ch-changes, oh, look out
you rock 'n rollers —David Bowie, “Changes,” Hunky Dory We launched the
sixth e...
6 comments:
Sadly, this is a thought that has bubbled up in my mind on any number of occasions - frequently somewhere around hour eight... Occasionally much after...
That's why we have prayer books.
Unitarians did, and in one case in the UK still produced one, with maybe a few using 1932, but the language moves on at such a rate and there is no consensus about their meaning and adequacy to use them any more. One of two still do much extempore.
Perhaps on occasion, use the prayer book as a starter and update the words. That would be a bit easier than starting from scratch every week. Although, original liturgies can be lovely.
The lack of readily available frameworks for worship is a major failing for those lay persons who are called upon occasionally to lead Unitarian services ; when I was in this position some years ago many hours were spent searching for suitable readings/prayers/meditations even before one got to considering the sermon.
I think congregations generally appreciate a few familiar landmarks in the service ; too many lead to the 'liturgical coma' but too few and services become a succession of novelties ; newcomers,particularly,in my opinion,appreciate some kind of 'map' of what is going to happen and like to know where the church is 'coming from',doctrinally. In a denomination where fewer and fewer chapels have settled ministry, an outline framework for worship could establish a valuable unity for the congregation while in no way hampering the freedom of the worship leader to explore his/her own distinct message.
I use prayer books for structures, but none relate to Unitarian ranges of belief. In this one there is the structure of sorry, thanks, reading, a celebration of time, sermon, but more the hymn sandwich, and more on music for meditation along with all the hymn tunes to put to CD (with no organist). I fear now it is all too long.
Post a Comment